Ann Coulter: Hillary over McCain

In an interview on Glenn Beck's show on Headline News, Ann Coulter stated that she'd rather have Hillary Clinton in the White House than John McCain.



I'm not sure I totally agree - just hearing Hillary's voice gives me a headache, so just listening to the State of the Union every year would become a major undertaking.

Coulter definitely has a point, though: of the three candidates, Hillary looks to be the most conservative. It's a close call (and a bit frightening to any conservative who may be wondering what the U.S. will look like in 2012), but there it is.

John McCain has tried pandering to the conservative base of the Republican party, but in doing so, he seems to have forgotten that conservatives aren't fools - real conservatives aren't mind-numbed Republican robots - we remember McCain-Fiengold. We remember McCain-Kennedy. We remember the "Gang of Fourteen." And we know that's not who we want in the White House.

One other important point that Coulter brings up in her column: one of the things that has endeared McCain to Republicans is the fact that he's a Vietnam Vet. So is Duncan Hunter, and he would've made a much, much better choice for president.

Personally, I can't say that I'd rather have Hillary than McCain - any of the big three (Clinton, McCain & Obama) would be horrible choices for America, and I wouldn't vote for any of them.

At this point, given the choice of Clinton vs. McCain or Obama vs. McCain, I think I'll probably write in Ann Coulter.

I'm In Love With Ann Coulter

(post title taken from the song by The Right Brothers)

I finished reading Ann Coulter's latest book the other day...needless to say, it was excellent. Not her best work, to be sure (that would be Godless), but still well worth the money.

Coulter is constantly under attack by the left. Nearly every time Coulter's name is mentioned, it's followed by phrases such as "gone too far" or "beyond the pale." She is commonly called a fascist, racist, anti-semite, and any other of various names that leftists can come up with.

The thing that I love about Ann Coulter is that she gets under liberals' skin. She combines facts with conservative ideology and a healthy dose of humor to produce some of the best material the Right has ever seen.

The answer to the question posed by Time Magazine (is she serious or just having fun?) is: both.

This is something many liberals have lost: it's possible to promote your ideology without taking yourself too seriously.
It's possible to engage in political debate and have fun doing it.

The one thing that draws me to conservatism is that it makes sense. Conservative positions require logical reasoning, where liberalism is ruled by emotion.


Just to show that she's not affected by liberal lies, smears, and name calling, her latest book (If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans) is a collection of the quotes that earned her the most ridicule from the Left.

The sad thing is, political correctness has so inundated our society that Coulter draws a lot of criticism from people on the Right, as well. These people need to stop listening to liberal lies about what is and isn't appropriate. They need to grow up and get a sense of humor. They need to turn their backs on the liberal doctrine of wussification and understand that if we listen to the liberal lies every time they say "gone too far" or "beyond the pale," liberalism will win. We cannot let the other side dictate just what is and is not appropriate. Conservatives need to stand up for conservatism, if for no other reason than that it is worth defending.

When it comes to conservative icons, Ronald Reagan is king. He was the President for two terms, and he showed the world just what it means to stand for freedom and true conservative values. The world may never see such a high quality of man come out of Hollywood ever again.

The thing that draws people to Ann Coulter is that she is truly Reaganesque. Many Republicans try to sell themselves as Reaganesque on issues, but issues didn't make Reagan great. The thing that made Ronald Reagan the great man that he was was the fact that he was conservative through and through, and he wasn't afraid to stand up for his beliefs. He had deep faith, and he wasn't ashamed of it. He didn't buy into the liberal lies about "separation of church and state" meaning that religious people somehow shouldn't let their faith values effect how they vote. He wasn't willing to give evil a pass just because America doesn't have a spotless record.

Ann Coulter, like Ronald Reagan, is a not ashamed to be a conservative. She isn't afraid to call evil out for what it is. And she's not afraid to address liberal emotionalism bluntly and with wit.

The liberal doctrine of political correctness makes people tremble when they hear someone like Ann Coulter speak plainly about liberal hypocracy. And liberals truly are hypocrites: we only have one Ann Coulter, whose doses of truth spun with biting wit send liberals into temper tantrums, but liberals have dozens of people who are unafraid to spread hateful lies, smearing conservatives and trying to ruin their lives just because of political disagreements.

Any conservative who denounces Ann Coulter as being too harsh should be ashamed. The conservative movement needs more people like Ann Coulter, unafraid to speak their minds, unashamed of their beliefs, willing to stand up before an onslaught of liberal hate speech and tell it like it is. If we allow liberals, in the guise of political correctness, to dictate what we can and cannot say, we may as well kiss the United States of America, the freest nation on the planet, goodbye. America needs Ann Coulter to remind conservatives that liberal speech isn't the only form of speech protected under the First Amendment.

And any liberal that says that this comment has "gone too far," or that comment was "beyond the pale" should look at their own side of the aisle and see the hate speech emanating from their own party.

Ann Coulter says "faggot," Dems seek to put her into rehab.

This past weekend at CPAC (the Conservative Political Action Conference), Ann Coulter made news (see the video above). Now, the strange thing, as I see it, is how liberals keep on proving Ann Coulter right.

The last time Ann was the subject of this kind of virulent debate was when her last book, Godless was set to come out. In that book, she refered to certain 9/11 widows (the ones who had joined together into a seemingly untouchable political action group) "harpies." Coulter took a lot of flak for that remark, even before the book came out. I, being a fan of Ann Coulter's column and her previous books, was understandibly intrigued, and looked forward eagerly to the book's release. As it turned out, the chapter in which she called these widows "harpies" was a chapter about how liberals put forward victims; people whose credibility is extremely difficult to impeach because to do so would be politically incorrect...and by attacking her so virulently over this comment, they proved her right - and this fact has been borne out again and again, through the 9/11 widows becuase their husbands were killed, Christopher Reeves because he was paralyzed, Michael J. Fox because he has parkinson's (or Hilary Clinton because she's a woman, or Al Sharpton & Jessie Jackson because they're black, et cetera, et cetera).

Now, by crying and whining about her comments at CPAC, the Left is proving Ann right yet again. She said "I think you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,'" and all kinds of people on the Left and the Right have shunned her as if she were a leper or a crack whore, and needed to go into rehab.


Personally, I find Ann Coulter to be a very funny woman. I enjoy her commentary, if only because she tells it like it is without taking everything so seriously. I thought her comment at CPAC was funny, and I'm not sorry she said it, nor will I try to distance myself from her because it was politically incorrect.

Why? Because political correctness was first thought up by the Soviet Union: if you said something that was "politically incorrect," you were either executed, sent to a labor camp, or send to a "reeducation center," depending on the severity of the offense. Anyone who says the Cold War is over is deluding themselves: the war has not ended, it has only been transformed. Instead of fighting Communism in Russia, we are now fighting it within our own borders. The Commie cause has been taken up by the Democrat Party, who seeks to silence any dissent and opposition through the guidelines of political correctness, even while they seek to take control of people's everyday lives through government programs, prohibitive legislation, and Supeme Court opinions.

Keep speaking out, Ann. You will always have at least one supporter in me.